Rather than spend my valuable time creating important talking points for an upcoming lobbying campaign at work, I'll jot down some random questions in the wake of the speech Obama gave today (which were in reaction to the public reaction to some old Jeremiah Wright comments.)
Primarily, my questions are about mainstream (i.e., white) reaction to black anger and I'll try to keep my thoughts as succinct as possible.
(Thoughts about the theology, or lack of theology, represented by Wright's remarks are outside of my skill set.)
Why is it, whether expressed in the way that Wright had done, in the comedy of Dave Chappell or the comic strips of Aaron MacGruder, that folks can't seem to understand where black socio-political anger comes from?
What and who is served by the public pressure for Obama (or any black person) to distance himself from the problematic comments like the ones Wright made (or even the ones made by Farrakhan)?
What fears are assuaged once this distancing has happened and, conversely, what fears are stoked when a black person refuses?
What allegiances or reassurances are being sought through this kind of pressure?
Why must people of color perform this kind of white supremacy power dance when individual white people don't? (For instance, we have yet to see any kind of well-wrought distancing speech from Hillary Clinton after Ferarro's avowedly pro-white comments were made.)
Why does the word 'minstrelsy' come to mind?
No comments:
Post a Comment